There is a lot of talk about

a page that takes a break for the Lunar New Year.

1.
There is a lot of talk about Lee Jae-myung, chairman of the main opposition Minjoo Party of Korea. It is likely to emerge as the core of politics in February after the holiday. By the time of the Constitutional Court's ruling, it will be louder.

Personally, he has been very negative about representative Lee Jae-myung since the rise of Son Ga-hyuk, who was a big supporter of him. As I wrote in the last presidential election, I often told my acquaintances that he is suspected of being a fascist. I adjusted my evaluation a little right before the presidential election, but I still couldn't cross the line of evaluation that it was a "pragmatic fascination."

Even now, there are points where I cannot trust him and call him an unsuspecting democratic comrade by my feisty standards. It is not necessarily because of the legal noise surrounding him. His daily and political actions and actions make him nervous about making accurate judgments.

In fact, the situation in which the legal issue surrounding him will be interpreted solely on the legal ground has long passed. If you have the ability to judge what the prosecution and the Yoon Suk Yeol have done, you cannot just dismiss this as a matter of law. Now, it is irrational to completely defend him in all legal aspects, and it is also irrational to criticize him thoroughly for legal reasons.

Prior to the question of law, he is at a point where he is unusually evaluated as an aspect of human beings themselves by a politician. It is not political correctness or ideological justification, but it raises doubts about what he is really thinking. It is not a matter to blame anyone for walking in the past like that on his own.

2.
Nevertheless, there is always a feeling that someday he will become president. This is because the world does not move according to the ideal of textbooks, and it is important not only to think and act but also to strengthen the will to carry out political goals to the end.

If Lee Jae-myung is excluded from any kind of value judgment, he is by far at the top of the list of political wills in Korea. As far as this field is concerned, he seems to be at the top of the list not only in Korea but also in Asia as a whole. The difference between him and the runner-up in terms of will is meaningless at all. (In fact, it is blocked from even discussing who the second place can be.) Perhaps the Democratic Party's bone marrow supporters would put a double eyelid on their eyes and express it, but on the level of will, he gives a strong impression that he is compared to a Kim Dae Jung or a Roh Moo Hyun.

This quality is in the spotlight in the political worldview of classical works in East Asia. Against the prosecution and the Yoon Suk Yeol regime's general offensive, Lee Jae-myung deserves the so-called "Wasin Counseling" test, in which he lies on thorny firewood and overcomes hardships by tasting bitter gallbladder.

3.
For example, if the father-in-law's favorite view of the Three Kingdoms-style martial arts politics, it would be no wonder that he would sit on the throne about five times. He relentlessly suppressed and eliminated competitors, infiltrated and strengthened his organization throughout the camp, captured enemy generals, held key organizations in his hands, and structured his own upbringing to ensure the organization's survival. All of this was done from the bare ground without a reliable background.

This ability is attractive in itself, so the more you do it, the more people gather. But how is this huge movement carried out? It is only possible with a steady drive of will. As such, in terms of will, Lee Jae-myung has an unrivaled ability.

At the same time, it is a quality that will be recognized in an old and rustic political world view. This talent is also necessary for 21st-century politics, but modern-day Na Gwan-jung, who enjoys politics as if it were martial arts, will be more welcome. There was probably no problem until the early 2000s.

Now I have a question.

4.
Here is an extraordinary triangular character who combines resourcefulness, scheming, tenacity, and other classical political power to eventually fulfill his will. But how well does this person fit the ideal politician image required by the modern democratic system. In other words, even when the democracy that the Republic of Korea aims for in 2025 meets, it remains questionable whether his political actions can be said to be consistent. This is his problem.

Will has nothing to do with the distinction of the values of good and evil. Even those who are good-natured and good, or those who are twisted and crooked, can have a strong will. In other words, the charm expressed by the strong will does not necessarily mean a positive personality. The Yoon Suk Yeol also had the will to leave the office after being hated by the regime. What matters is whether the individual's will contributes to the interests of others.

A democratic society leads individuals to drive various desires and finally create various altruistic results. I don't know any tool other than democracy that each selfish act structurally guarantees the universal interests of others. From that point of view, I think that the most brilliant point of the working principles of democracy is that 'static power also guarantees my interests'. Is Lee Jae-myung true to this principle.

5.
In real politics, rival parties fret over each other's failure to eat, but if a democratic system is in operation, the substance in the act helps everyone's rights and livelihood. On the other hand, the Yoon Suk Yeol's December 3 civil war broke the basic principle that even political opponents guarantee profits. Therefore, Yoon's actions are anti-democratic.

In other words, if someone is seen as a democrat, the intuition that his will is in my interest is easy to come to. Otherwise, my disadvantage will inevitably be immediately detected.

In summary, this is the sense of discord that Lee Jae-myung shows his strong will to take power, which means that his will to power for democracy is not seen as altruistic, which is why he is expected to be disadvantaged in the future. For those who oppose Lee Jae-myung, except for those who support the people's power, anti-democratic displeasure builds up in each of his actions as a democracy.

6.
This is also the same as the bitter criticism of the Democratic Party of Korea. Currently, there are four major forces criticizing the Democratic Party of Korea. Excluding the supporters of the people's power, three remain.

First, a non-partisan group who sees the Democratic Party of Korea at a certain distance. Second, although they critically support the Democratic Party of Korea