테슬라 사이버트럭 리콜명령

"테슬라 사이버트럭 3,878대 가속 페달 고장 리콜 발령"


ㄴ ㅋㅋㅋ 사이버트럭이 큰 사고가 일어나기전에... 미리 고객이 문제점을 알려주어서 대응하기 시작했네요

천만다행입니다

순간적으로 주가가하락하기도 했지만, 그래도 다시 금방 호재가 나오면서 오르겠죠 ^^

170달러 172달러 매물대를 돌파하는지 여부가 매우 중요한 자리인데... 횡보하다가 움직일련지?

ㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡㅡ


테슬라는 오늘 2023년 11월 13일부터 2024년 4월 4일까지 생산된 약 3,878대의 사이버트럭에 가속 페달 고장 리콜을 발령했다고 밝혔다.

이번 리콜은 운전자가 페달을 너무 세게 밟으면 페달 패드가 분리되어 트림 아래 끼일 수 있다는 문제로 인해 발생했다. 이 경우 페달이 꼼짝없이 눌린 상태가 되어 가속을 멈출 수 없는 위험한 상황이 발생할 가능성이 있다. 특히 최고 출력 845마력의 '사이버비스트' 삼전동기 모델은 더욱 위험하다고 판단된다.

테슬라는 리콜 안내문에서 "브레이크 페달은 가속 페달과 동시에 밟았을 때에도 동력을 차단하며, 계속해서 브레이크 페달을 밟으면 마치 가속 페달을 밟지 않은 것처럼 차량을 정지시킬 수 있다"고 밝혔다. 그러나 테슬라는 가속 페달 고장 발생 시 즉각적인 조치를 취할 것을 촉구했다.

테슬라는 3월 31일 처음으로 고객으로부터 문제를 인지했으며, 4월 3일에는 두 번째 고객 불만 사례가 접수되었다. 이후 테슬라는 테스트를 진행한 결과 "허가되지 않은 변경으로 부품 조립을 돕기 위해 윤활제(비누)를 사용했으며, 잔여 윤활제가 페달 패드와 페달 간의 접착력을 감소시켰다"는 결론을 내렸다.

테슬라는 이미 4월 17일 현재 생산 라인에 투입된 모든 사이버트럭에 새로운 부품 번호를 가진 가속 페달을 장착했다고 밝혔다. 아직 판매되지 않은 기존 생산 차량 역시 출고 전에 문제 해결 작업이 진행될 예정이다.

소유자는 테슬라 고객 서비스 센터에 문의하거나 테슬라 웹사이트에 방문하여 자신의 차량이 리콜 대상인지 확인하고 수리 예약을 할 수 있다.

이번 리콜은 테슬라에게 또 다른 타격이 될 것으로 예상된다. 사이버트럭은 출시 이후 여러 차례 지연과 문제로 인해 주목을 받아왔다. 이번 리콜은 테슬라의 품질 관리 시스템에 대한 우려를 다시 불러일으킬 가능성이 높다.

출처 : 탑기어 https://www.topgear.com/car-news/usa/uh-oh-tesla-has-recalled-every-single-cybertruck

I think the meaning of plagiarism that Min Hee-jin argues is whether the eyelet could have been made without New Jeans.

This can be thought of the other way around, was it possible for an adore to be built without a hive.

{Contributions from Hive}

Min Hee-jin has great skills and experience. But I wonder in this regard why she did not have the money to build Adore.

When I tried to start a new job with my career as SM's creative director, there must be an important reason why I chose Bang Si-hyuk's hive without working at SM's rivals YG and JYP.
One of the important reasons may be money, and what people in businesses that make money through creativity, such as IT and entertainment, feel in common is that it is the most difficult to receive investment, whether it is the first 100 million won or 1 billion won, rather than making 10 billion won into hundreds of billions of won.

In other words, the 16 billion won that went into making New Jeans, back then, there would have been no place to give it away. Even if you give it away, it's possible that it was a slave contract. And maybe, even though you had that career in SM, you couldn't make that much money at SM.

It is Hive's contribution to paying 16 billion won and also creating his own brand Adore to become a representative, and furthermore, through great consideration, he guaranteed hundreds of billions of won in actual profits to Min Hee-jin.
Then, at SM, where he served for a longer time, we have to wonder why Min Hee-jin couldn't make that much money, let alone this big money.

Just as BLACKPINK belongs to YG, if Min Hee-jin had worked with YG, he would not have been able to get an independent brand called Adore and the position of CEO of the company. That's even more so because New Jeans would have been subordinate to Black Pink.

Hive's contribution will be greater in other ways. With the global success of BTS (BTS), it has significantly elevated the status of K-pop, which has since created an environment where the Korean entertainment industry feels less than 100 billion won.

{Damage on both sides}

It is likely that both sides will lose hundreds of billions of won or more. However, Hive's losses are much greater, and Min Hee-jin is in big breach of trust. (There are quite a few places that have already covered this in detail, and this is omitted.)

{How IT entrepreneurs use Min Hee-jin in his position}

You've benefited a lot from investors, but you often feel that the rewards are low. That's more likely for IT or entertainment.

In the case of IT, we exit at this time. Both investors and entrepreneurs can exit. Investors recover the investment and receive profits calculated from the past contributions. Entrepreneurs will also receive cash back their contributions in the process, whether it is a listing or a merger.

However, there is a premise of this exit, which is that the products made so far belong to the company while maintaining high value.

But what you do when an exit that satisfies both sides is difficult, you act to break the relationship before this exit, and the founder leaves the company behind.
At this time, the company attributes the products it has made with the investment and the technology and sales information accordingly. This is because the salary received so far is the price.

However, founders can still independently use the technology they discovered they had before they received the investment, and the technology and information they acquired after the investment will be used in consultation with the company they left or avoided. The detailed discussion is about how much money they receive.

If you apply this practice to Min Hee-jin, she can immediately attribute it to Hive and create a new group while maintaining the value of Newzins as a result if she wants to liquidate her relationship with Hive.

You can create a company for this as much as you want. You can even create a group that keeps the concept of Newzins intact.

But in the IT industry, that's possible when you take out the portion of what you get from Hibb, or you pay back everything except for your salary and expenses. (In other words, if you get a huge amount of money, your contribution is no longer yours. You're selling your rights to the company, and you have to start anew.) This is a "bilateral device."

(And if you follow the standards of the IT industry, what if you want to take Newzins out and have exclusive rights instead of creating a group of the same concept?
In that case, you have to return the salary you received, and you have to settle the expenses spent by the investor.
Because this puts a lot of pressure on IT founders, most of them don't do this and attribute the products they have developed to the company while maintaining their value. So you have to either return the rest of your salary and expenses to the company and seek a better product that you can compete with, or you have to pay more and give up the right to make a product like that by making products in a different area than what you have left there.)