On the day of the arrest

[Truth and doctrine] Seok Yeol's approval rating is over 40%??
On the day of the arrest, there were not as many people as I thought??
I don't see any of those common YouTubers??
Are the pockets already thick??

The Bible records that Adam was 130 years old when Adam and Hawah, the first human beings, gave birth to Three. Presumably, Adam and Hawah lived in the Garden of Eden for a little over 100 years. Before giving birth to the three, they had two sons, Cain and Abel, which happened for about 30 years after Eden. The Bible proves that Abel was a "sheepher" and Cain was a "farmer."

The very human beings discovered by modern science originated in Africa 7 million years ago and formed a tribe by the spread of homos to the Eurasian continent around 2 million years ago. According to human scientists, 99.8% of human history is from the Paleolithic Age. The event of 'human evolution' begins 10,000 years ago from the Neolithic Age. From this point on, humans began to settle down using tools. For nearly 7 million years, humans survived by hunting and collecting in primitive ways, and for this purpose, they have constantly been moving.

However, the Bible testifies that these two men began the first herding and farming of mankind in 130 years at the most. Conservative Christian fundamentalists and writers who advocate the theory of self-inspiration argue that the Bible is God's word without errors, made up of God's inspiration. However, the Old Testament is not a human "historical book" that speaks of God, but a "literary book" in the Near East created by human imagination based on the Sumerian civilization.

The 'New Testament' is not a chronological history book, but a 'literary book' that is close to a mechanism that combines documents passed down by word of mouth and personal correspondence. The first biblical text is not the current order No. 1, Matthew, but Paul's letter, Galadians. Paul is known to have been born in AD 10 and died around AD63-67. Paul has never met a living Jesus in his lifetime. Not only that, but he has never seen the '4 Gospels'. There is no record of the words of Jesus in the 13 letters he wrote, starting with Galadians, who wrote around AD 48, when he began his activities. This is because it was not written based on the 'Gospels', but was recorded based on the life of Hellan Jews and the culture of Aramaic-speaking Jerusalemite Jews.

The first Gospels, the Maga Gospel, were made around AD 70 after Paul's death, and other Gospels were also made between AD 90 and AD 110. Since all of the Gospels were made after Paul's death, Paul, of course, had no information about them. For this reason, most of the letters he wrote focused on doctrines based on church life rather than the words of Jesus. The "4 Gospels" were also hypothesized and recorded by future followers based on oral myths after both Jesus and his disciples died.

Paul was the first to claim to have seen the resurrection of Jesus. He claims to have experienced the illusion of meeting Jesus on the Damesec iconography to prove his qualifications as an apostle, but no one can prove this illusion in reality. It is only his own argument. So who resurrected Jesus and why did he have to?

Death is a natural consequence of life because all human beings are finite creatures. No one in human history has died or survived. Therefore, if a person dies or survives, he will inevitably be recognized as the son of God, the absolute being who transcends the natural world. Did Jesus' resurrection himself to prove his divine existence? Or was Paul created as a manipulation to prove his apostasy?

If Jesus had resurrected himself to prove that he was divine, he should have shown up to Billado, Herot, and the Jews who opposed him, rather than appearing secretly like an illusion to his disciples. Proof should be for the unbeliever, not for the believer. Because it is worth it only when it is proved to correct their errors.

If this resurrection, which is the most shocking event in human history, was a historical fact, it should have repented Vilado and Herod, and a massive "repentance movement" should have taken place throughout Judea and Europe. There had to be a number of records of repentance in Israel's history and Roman history, and there had to be records of the Book of Resurrection in a broader content than the Gospels. Had it been so, his resurrection and divine existence would have been proved without doubt to future generations beyond time and space.

It would have proved that the resurrection of Jesus was not a fantasy experience by followers, and there would have been no tragedies in human history, such as religious wars or the massacre of Jews. Judaism, Islam, Catholicism, and Christianity of the same roots of monotheism would have heretical to each other and not divided into different sects. There would have been only one religion, 'Jesusism'.

However, Jesus ascended to heaven in only 40 days without any evidence or influence on history and mankind other than meeting his disciples. What was the meaning of the number 40 symbol of the rambunctious Jewish people? They are threatening humanity to reforestation and judge the land. If it were this kind of judgment, what guarantee would not only be made of forests, forests, and forests? If it was truly the right to judge humanity in the land, wouldn't it have been correct to judge immediately when it was revived? Like the Old Testament's 'Flood Judgment'.

Paul argued that Jesus would reign at his time. It was said that the world was a fortress of 將亡, Rome would soon perish, and Israel would be freed from Roman oppression. However, Rome, which was said to be doomed soon, collapsed after a thousand years, and Israel was liberated after 2,000 years. Even after 50, 100, 500, and 2,000 years, Jesus, who was supposed to reign at his time, has still not been re-established.

I'd rather have a Buddhist 「myrkhaesaeng