The reason why it is difficult

The reason why it is difficult to implement policies such as politics, economy, and social welfare in Korea is because of the polarization. President Yoon Suk Yeol won by 0.7 percent, while the Democratic Party of Korea, which won the majority, was 5.7 percent higher based on votes alone. In other words, although the Democratic Party won in each district, its support for the opposition party was 5.7 percent higher overall. In other words, the party has a majority, but it is not a majority.

The president won by a new margin of 0.7%, and the National Assembly won by a landslide by about 5.7%...

This polarization continues. This means that it is not easy to deploy any policy.

For example, it's social welfare, let's increase welfare, let's increase welfare, let's say 50% oppose to collect more taxes. It's a structure in which 50% is supported and the two sides fight each other. So is the economy. If we release money to revive domestic demand, 50% is opposed. In the end, it should be seen that the people's thoughts are divided by the 45:55 game.

It is difficult for any government to implement policies in this way.
After all, what matters is the role of the media. However, as you know, the media is not functioning properly. Few media, conservative or progressive, lead the media with their own philosophy. In addition, it is a very difficult task in the current system, which is a structure for the turmoil of Internet media and mass production of fake news.

Lastly, it is the YouTuber issue. Whether they are politically influential or not, they have recently changed a lot into people who follow the temptation of money. The reason they fight fiercely, the reason they spread fake news, the tendency to become more and more far-right is related to money. More money is raised, maybe even stronger. Older people or far-right supporters shoot SuperChat because they are grateful for what they say and do instead of them. So the income is no joke. If you become a little famous, you can get 10 million won a day if you let a YouTuber know the protest site and your claim, which is the best business for a single person. I can't get rid of this taste of money.

YouTubers proceed quite differently in politics.
The YouTuber on the left is more political talk than a single YouTuber, and there are many YouTubers led by broadcasters or big media
There are many single-person YouTubers who cry. YouTubers led by broadcast media are not popular.
On the left, there is a YouTuber who is focused on broadcasting media and media
The crying one-man media is ranked at the top.  
Jin Sung-ho TV, Shin Hye-sik TV, Bae Seung-hee TV, and Shin In-gyun TV are all individual YouTubers.
So the income is no joke.

On the left, there are many media outlets or there are many corporate forms, so the host does not take all of the income. And most of the media outlets are taken by companies and used to compensate for their own media deficits.

But Woo's YouTuber has a lot of one person system (though of course there will be people covering it, producers, etc...) so he is free to post and incite fake news or provocative things.

When you look at this present...
It is not easy no matter which administration takes control.

Even though the role of the media is so important at this time, the solution to this problem is
It looks like a mess.

After all, we need to go slowly from recognizing this problem to economic experts, political experts, social experts to come up with a variety of solutions.

Regardless of who takes power, the slow principle, the principle of persuasion, the principle of waiting, etc. are kept in mind and efforts are desperately needed to persuade slowly, remembering that it is a regime that is only supported by 50%.

Even if you don't like it...