He rose to the center

He rose to the center of the controversy and eventually appeared in a news factory.

We "save" 1020 men who are exposed defenselessly to far-right YouTube. We've seen this before. Yes, this is the rhetoric that those who argued in the past that youth should be protected from the violence of games. You know, "save," "protection," and so on. The main development of the regulatory discourse about games was that they constantly inject violence into 1020 men, and that those who are exposed defenselessly are likely to end up committing crimes.

It's a dangerous approach, though. We will consider the men in their 10s and 20s affected by far-right discourse as "contaminated" and guide and purify them. To put it mildly, it's like, "My child is always nice, but he met the wrong friend." It means that unless the premise of a man in his 10s and 20s who became a far-right after being swept away by bad public opinion without his obvious subjectivity is laid down.

This only increases the likelihood of causing backlash. The subject of sanctions should be about the injustice of the act, and if you make the injustice of the accident itself a subject of sanctions, the accident is more likely to strengthen your inertia and strengthen it. Just as games are violent and you can't stop kids from playing, it's hard to stop men in their 10s and 20s from being far-right because the far-right ruins you. Wouldn't it be possible to encourage them.

We need to approach this carefully. If we create an environment where it is difficult for men in their 10s and 20s to be attracted to the far right under the premise that we reduce the scope of activities across the far right, wouldn't we know? The plan to separate men in their 10s and 20s from the far right while the far right as a whole is growing will be as difficult as removing the mine detonator from the battlefield flying here and there. It's better to stop the war first and start removing the mine detonator in a safer environment.

There is no need to add to the danger that society as a whole will face, and I fully acknowledge that there is no choice but to worry about the rightward shift, especially for men in their 10s and 20s. Eating in a hurry is an indigestion. Especially for men in their 10s and 20s, the influence of the same group works the most, so if they try to extort it from the perspective of family education, well, well, well, I don't know. If you say this, it will lead to a lot of sharp criticism, such as distorting the good will of parents or disparaging their efforts to do anything, but as usual, good intentions do not guarantee good results. If it is an unpredictable distortion, you may not know it, but if it is a way in which the risk seems obvious, you should approach it carefully.