Hilton Hyatt is the portable U.S

Hilton Hyatt is the portable U.S. for businessmen, the aircraft carrier and the U.S. military base is the portable U.S. for officers, and Air Force One is the portable U.S. for the president… I wonder what it would be like to see the U.S.'s MAGA activities these days by Korean Flemish scholarship students, who are nothing more than spies planted by the U.S.

D+321 #PSB #腦星 Keyword of the Day #Platform

It was rejected in 2003 when Andy Rubin visited Samsung headquarters in Seoul with his newly developed Android OS.

It's more than 17 years old this year and an article about this long-ago episode called "The Mistake of the Century" is still circulating.

Since the iPhone was released in 2007, if Samsung had the insight to acquire Android four years earlier, would it have opened the world of smartphones ahead of Apple?

I think it's a fundamentally wrong question.

Rather, you have to ask the question why the platform comes only from the United States.

Windows, Android, and iOS are all operating systems. All software in the world is a platform that runs on it.

The reason why the United States became a platform empire is not simply because of its technological prowess. This is because the essence of the country of the United States is a platform.

Rome, for example, was a platform.

You go into the kingdoms of Europe and the Middle East and North Africa, and you ask:

"Will you follow the order of the empire or will it disappear without a trace?"

Peace and prosperity are promised if you agree to be incorporated into Rome and conform. If you say you will fight back, you will fight to the end and annihilate without leaving any dust.

So the answer of Jesus is, "Give the things of Caesar to Caesar and the things of God to God" (Matthew 12:17).

This is Pax Romana. The United States took this lesson from Rome and opened the Pax Americana era in the 20th century.

Therefore, dozens of aircraft carriers are a key means of lining up the world in front of the platform empire, the United States.

Of course, the United States did not become the current platform empire by wielding force alone.

He has brought in gifted students from each country as Fulbright scholars, raising the world's elite as pro-American for decades.

He also lured Hollywood, McDonald's, and Coca-Cola to voluntarily surrender to the charm of the United States with their soft power.

The computer operating system is essentially no different from this.

There can be no two emperors in the world, so if you decide to become a global platform, you must cut off challengers who oppose the empire's authority with a life-or-death determination.

Or give the generous emperor's generosity to developers around the world, like the Apple App Store, who give up 70% of their profits.

So the U.S.-China war now is none other than a platform war.

The U.S. thought China was self-sufficient as a global production base and was incorporated into Pax Americana's platform, but what!

China was also luring and stroking the world with money to follow China's platform instead of the American Standard by using the "One Belt, One Road."

There can be no two platforms under the sky. Therefore, all global stakeholders must be lined up under their own flag, whether using force or providing carrots.

Even if Samsung acquired Android in 2003, there was no DNA of the platform in the first place, and there was no willingness, ability, or convincing universal logic to threaten, mature, and pour resources into IT companies around the world until it became the only standard in the world.

If you really want to be a platform, so if you want to be a global standard, you have to be prepared to compete with the United States, the only global platform like China.

Whether it's English, SWIFT bank money networks, computer operating systems, or key currency dollars, all global platforms are ultimately maintained only through overwhelming force.

If the conflict intensifies and a compromise is not reached, it is decided by a conflict of power at the end.

Therefore, if China had sincerely put its national luck on the Belt and Road platform, it should have at least had an aircraft carrier enough to counter the U.S.

In addition, it was necessary to have a soft power powerful enough for the world to surrender itself to China's cultural charm, even if it was not sharp force.

China is now in this predicament after poorly aiming for global platform status before it has sufficient force as an empire and yet attractive soft power.

Therefore, the Android operating system was not destined to be embraced by Samsung and Korea in the first place.

The platform is like an absolute ring, so if we hugged it poorly, we would have collapsed first without being able to handle it.

Whether it's a computer operating system, an industry standard, an international payment system, GPS, the Internet, all the platforms in the world today are managed by the United States alone,

This is because no other country in the world has the DNA of this platform other than the United States since the fall of the former Soviet Union.

Also, if someone challenges the authority of the platform, there is no aircraft carrier leaflet to shoot with force.

This is not to say not to dream of a platform. First, look at what you have to pay to secure it and whether you have the capacity to manage it after you actually have it.

Today, it is also advice to numerous civil servants in this land who lightly name the platform as Netflix in Korea, Wondo in Korea, and 5G in Korea.

It is not a matter of technological prowess. It is a question of whether we have the appearance and capabilities of an empire.

If you ask the wrong question about the platform because you're greedy, it's just like China

#One line summary: It's not that it's successful and it's global. It's successful because it's global…