The war in Ukraine is a complete

The war in Ukraine is a complete victory for Russia. For now, Russia has replaced its armoured personnel with hundreds of thousands of casualties and pushed the country to the east.

No Western country can afford this amount of damage and material consumption. However, Russia mobilized and achieved its goal.

Ukraine does not have the ability to retake the east, and Russia no longer has the ability to move westward. The front line is fixed and the war is virtually over.

What's left is post-war treatment. I don't think Europe will ever wake up. Europe will never mobilize the resources that the U.S. consumes to protect the world order and the level of human loss. We tolerate an ideology that coordinates the interests of resource allocation, violates one's interests, puts labor and capital for the production of the military industry, puts in money to support it, and preaches its justification? Europe? I don't think so.

Russia will recover the 10,000 armoured equipment and build weapons using the doctrines it acquired during the war. It will also deploy cognitive warfare.

Hungary, Romania and Moldova will have pro-Russian regimes and now the Balkans will be a powder keg again.

Intelligence agencies must be strengthened to monitor people's lives and obtain information to crush the enemy's cognitive war to Russia. Will it be possible?

Mobilization of materials, operation of anti-cognitive intelligence agencies. Military economy-first industrial policy. Is it possible?

I can now understand why Park Chung-hee performed the Yushin Reform after Vietnam collapsed. The development of the heavy and chemical industry was frequently linked to national defense, public announcement was made, and in technology classes, middle school students learned how to use micrometers to operate shelves, the state cultivated shelf engineers, and the Korean military industry, centered on self-defense, from guns to tanks and fighter jets, was completed. I can see the extent to which politicians, entrepreneurs, engineers, and scientists, who were united in their loyalty to the country and the desire for self-defense, have devoted themselves to watching the Korean defense industry, which is approaching the inefficiency of the Western military industry based on civil logic.

We are a country that stands on its legacy. It is a country that has come this far with a state mobilization system on its basis.

Before our system was completely destroyed, the world's hegemonic battlefield is now open.

In this presidential election, politicians should present their visions by organizing how they will handle our national mobilization system, how far they will raise the status of their alliance with the United States, what they will have to bear, and what they will gain from it.

I take Zelenskyy's exit with grave consideration. The president who blocked Russia's advance into Kyiv is now the one who leaves while facing a fixed front. Just as Churchill, De Gaulle, and Park Chung-hee felt bitter about their exit, Zelenskyy left bitterly. He did what he was supposed to do.

Now it is time for him to start his activities as an ideologue preaching the post-Ukrainian politics, the awakening necessary for Europe to have a mobilization system.

No matter how rich and well-off Europe is, it cannot stop Russia and China's Yurysia wave.

No matter how developed the industry, Europe does not currently have the capacity to produce enough quality and quantity for the military industry.

Zelensky will remain a leader who preaches to Europe, and to the world, on electricity, weapons, and supplies

We will now see a post-tank lush cognitive lush in Eastern Europe.

This is not a matter for me. Is South Korea ready to endure this great bloodbath?