Deepseek is not one.

Deepseek is not one.
Deepseek v3 - This is performance like gpt4o, and it's 607b in size. It's hard to spin on a regular server, so you need to connect to deepseek in China to use it. At this point, you should think it's secure and use it.

Deepseek R1 - This is a gpt o1 competitive model. We specialize in logical reasoning. It has various sizes. It varies from 1.5b to 671b, as shown in the picture below. You can download it to pc from about 8b and run it directly from lm Studio, olama. In this case, there is no security issue because it goes back from my pc without connecting to the Chinese server. If you are concerned about security, you can turn off the internet and run it. If pc spec is okay, it will probably go back to 32b.
Janus pro 7b - this is a generative ai that came out competing with dalle3. This goes back in pc.

It's all open source, so there's no fee. Now that it's been published in a paper, deepseek will try application methods in other countries as well as the United States. Better things will come out. The idea that AI in the United States is flattened is too much, and deepseek has built a lot of it into the technology base of the United States.

It's a bit too much for China to outperform the United States. It's a little bit of a scratch on America's pride. It's different from the Soviet sphincter moment. It's the time to take German v2 rocket developers to completely cut off the technology of both countries, and it's about developing technology while it's almost open, so it doesn't matter who's ahead.

It's important what happens in the future.
And the algorithms and training methods employed by Deepseek are going to be applied to their products by various companies, and that's why technology is universal. And the United States is going to regulate gpu harvesting.


<China-U.S. confrontation - artificial intelligence and organ transplantation>

Ahead of the Lunar New Year's Day, China's 'DeepSeek' surprised the world and threatened US-led artificial intelligence. Can China's artificial intelligence surpass the US's 'ChatGPT'? As a doctor, I cannot say for sure.

However, I am confident that China has surpassed the U.S. in the field of medicine. Chinese medicine similar to oriental medicine? No. China is the only country that recognizes Chinese medicine, and Korea is the only country that recognizes Chinese medicine similar to Chinese medicine. No matter how much the state supports and pushes, it is only possible to paralyze a person with a single shot of saliva, penetrate blood, and save a dying person with herbal ironing water. The medical field that supports even the Chinese judicial system is organ transplantation.

In early 2020, during the height of COVID-19 from China around the world, a paper was published that shook the medical world in China. It was reported that lung transplantation was successfully performed in five patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to lung fibrosis caused by COVID-19. It was the world's first lung transplant operation for a COVID-19 infected patient. However, the response of the global medical community to this paper was not surprising, but a shock.

Lung transplants are typically tabooed in cases of infectious acute lung injury. Even if a bacterial or viral damaged lung is replaced, there is a high risk that the remaining pathogen will infect the new one. (The Chinese paper said the lung transplant was performed one month after the COVID-19 infection.)

Moreover, unlike kidneys, lungs are extremely limited in supply. It is challenging to obtain a brain-dead person's lung, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, and donors were even slimmer. However, in China, lungs could be provided quickly to five patients. As a result, suspicions were raised about the organ's origin.

As if aware of the controversy, the paper emphasized, "No lungs were obtained from death row inmates." However, this sentence rather turned suspicions into conviction.

"China's executions are often determined by specific transplant procedures," said Nicola Becklin, director of East Asia at MST, a global human rights organization. "The execution of the death penalty is to set the date and time when a patient is ready." He went on to reveal that the majority of organs transplanted in China have been extracted from 3,000 to 7,000 people on death row. The chairman of China's Organ Donation Transplantation Committee acknowledged that China was using death row organs when he was deputy health minister in 2005 and that 90 percent of transplants in 2011 were performed using death row organs.

Even more shocking, a paper noted that "heart extraction must be the direct cause of donor death" in 71 organ transplants

In other words, China did not remove the organs of a dead death row prisoner, but rather the organs of a living death row prisoner and put them to death.

Here's why I'm sure China is number one in the world in transplantation.

First, young people on death row are young. In other words, young organs have a high success rate after donation.  
Second, when transplanted alive, the success rate is approximately 10% higher than that of transplanting organs from brain-dead people.
Third, in an environment where medical ethics are ignored, transplants close to biological experiments are unlimited.

Currently, the No. 1 official organ transplant country is the U.S. But unofficially, China is No. 1. Is this the result of medical innovation? Is it the product of ethical collapse? Should we marvel at it or fear it?

#Dr. Shineul #deepseek #US and China #Organ transplant #Chineseorgan transplant #Chinesephysician #human rights in China