본문 바로가기

U.S stocks [2025] ISSUE arrangemet

Musk's DOGE. Not long ago, it was

반응형

Musk's DOGE. Not long ago, it was a 51-49 chance of success, but by looking at its recent moves, it's a 60-40 chance of success.

Trump and Vance's foreign policy and domestic administration reform are technically in different categories. By all accounts, Trump's foreign policy is a thug, and it's easy to expect it to come as a bigger problem for the United States in time.

However, domestic reform is bound to cause tremendous pain and resistance right now, but once that point of pain passes, a highly efficient and performing organization will inevitably be created. I believe that what DOGE is pursuing now has the same intentions as Carter's Zero-Base Budgeting. Carter failed, but now the decision maker is Musk. And improving these inefficiencies is his field of expertise.

I saw the biggest risk of this reform as 'Will Trump ever be able to share power?' and I thought it was impossible due to the nature of power. But according to the news so far, Trump seems to be distributing power. I was embarrassed because Trump's behavior was different from what I've seen before, but even if it's prevalent later, it seems that he really trusts and entrusts it.

I saw the second risk as a matter of national governance. State governance is different from corporate governance, so one force cannot make exclusive decisions, and the will is always realized through negotiations with other agencies and groups. I thought that governance reflected the constitutional spirit of seeking separation of powers, but I thought that if this was bypassed or ignored, the judiciary or the legislature could raise the issue.

This principle of separation of powers reflects the aristocratic nature of the American Constitution. This is due to the fact that power was distributed through other organizations and election periods rather than by unilateral decisions through public opinion, so it can continuously reflect the ideas of the elite that last for a long time. On the other hand, the people's public opinion tends to change over time.

But the people of the U.S. gave Trump and his Republican Party power through the election. So they have to control policy only through the anti-Trump insurrection votes of the legislature, or the control of the judiciary. And last time, those controls seem to have done pretty well. But will they work again? I don't know.

Is this right? I think it's definitely not the right way, given the constitutional values. Then will it not work? No. Once it's done, I think it will definitely work. So what do you think is the biggest problem from the standpoint of implementing this?

That's time. When it comes to policies that are accompanied by pain, how quickly they complete reform is the key. Everyone has no choice but to protest when they suffer. However, if you feel the pain short, the user experience from post-reform efficiency can offset the pain.

So, even if the policy we are doing now is not the right way, I think that once we succeed, we can have more efficient and powerful performances after that.

(Summary) What Musk is doing is not justified, but if he succeeds, he will have an administration that is efficient and has strong performance, and his recent moves have made it a little more likely to succeed. This is the only way people who don't suffer direct damage.

Reform? Well, let's call it reform. I'll cut/abolish it because it's a waste of money. Have American presidents been stupid or corrupt and left to Medicaid, USAID, the IRS and even the Education Department FAA FEMA Farm Office?
I didn't touch it because I thought the cost of investigating and correcting it was higher than the current one. In other words, to do this reform properly, we need to grow the government organization and create a large inspection agency. Rather, it was effective not to touch it.
By the way, anyway, organizations that provide the services they need as a government are in a "deficit," so they omit to investigate the cause of the deficit and suddenly abolish the cut, not a bureaucrat, but an engineer-turned-businessman?
You know that DOGE is just an accidental 'dog name', right? It's literally a dog, a dog, a dog, a dog, a dog, a dog, a dog, just like its name.

The price of eggs is rising due to the avian flu, but the Agriculture Department shrinks and hurriedly cancels the dismissal, touches the FAA, and flies, so the dismissal is canceled again, and even after touching the Ministry of Energy, those involved in confidential nuclear weapons are dismissed, so cancel it

Typhoon season is coming soon, and I'll touch FEMA. Let's see where and what kind of storm will come.

Immigrant deportation performance is rather lower than at the end of Biden's term, and the amount saved by Doge's dog is several billion dollars.

It's just that Nazi-wannabe dogfather kid can't work, disastrously.

320x100