I saw a post written by Yang Kyung-kyu, a member of the Green Justice Party, in Oh My News, saying, "The Fatherland Innovation Party will not replace the Justice Party."
I'm going to talk very briefly about my impression of reading the two, as it is a repetition of the article in Slow News, "Five Reasons for Criticizing the Fatherland Innovation Party as Political Degeneration."
At the beginning of the article, Yang said, "From the perspective of members and lawmakers of the Green Justice Party, who are struggling to gain public support, I am not writing this article because others buy land and have a stomachache," but it seems to me that is the key reason.
Voters who wanted a clearer political force than the Democratic Party would have been interested in the Green Justice Party in the past, but since the advent of the Cho Kuk Innovation Party, they have not even looked at the Green Justice Party.
The people want to judge the tyranny of the Yoon Suk Yeol government through this election, and the Cho Kuk Innovation Party is talking about exactly that, but the Green Justice Party is talking about Ye's big two-party judgment, so there is nothing to compare.
Both houses of Congress are asking, "What is the difference from the pro-Park alliance 16 years ago?" I don't know if you're asking because you don't know, or if you're driving me like that even though you know I don't know. If you're asking because you don't know, you're ignorant, and if you know you're sneaky.
Sixteen years ago, the pro-Park alliance was an organization gathered under the name of a Park Geun Hye with the aim of making another lawmaker when existing lawmakers failed to win the nomination.
On the other hand, the Cho Kuk Innovation Party pushed scholars who had no intention of doing politics to the extreme by abusing their prosecution power, forcing Chairman Cho to form a political party and participate in the battle with the idea that such cases should no longer occur. Like the pro-Park alliance, the goal is not to become a member of the National Assembly, but to become a member of the National Assembly as a tool for judging the prosecution's republic.
Both houses argue that the Cho Kuk Innovation Party "has neither the qualifications nor the ability to judge the Yoon Suk Yeol government." I can return this sentence to the Green Justice Party. What on earth has the Justice Party done in the past four years to prevent tyranny of the Yoon Suk Yeol government? To sum up the past four years of the Justice Party in one word, it was a self-serving rebellion. Justice Party proportional representative number 1, Ryu Ho-jung, where is he doing now?
I don't even remember who the leader of the Justice Party is until now after he stepped down after being suspected of sexual harassment. Even though he had six lawmakers, he didn't have any presence in the National Assembly. I think it's too cruel compared to the remarkable achievements of the Basic Income Party, which is the only lawmaker Yong Hye-in, so I'll stop.
Qualifications and competence of the Cho Kuk Innovation Party? Shall we take a look at them? If we define the government of Yoon Suk Yeol in a word, it is the prosecution dictatorship, and the person who suffered the biggest damage from the prosecution's dictatorship and had no choice but to jump into politics. I think he is qualified to talk about judgment. Ability? I don't know yet. However, if a party that has been founded less than three months is competing with the power of the people beyond the Democratic Party in approval rating of proportional candidates, it is at least more capable than the Green Justice Party.
Many of the proportional candidates from Seoul National University who were around the legal profession are said to be the epitome of an elite party, but can't it be seen as an inevitable choice to compete head-on with the prosecution's dictatorship? It can be said that the Democratic Party of Korea took care of the economy and people's livelihoods, and the Cho Kuk Innovation Party took the lead in the fight against the prosecution's dictatorship.
I am also not taking a critical view of some of the candidates of the party. If I become a member of the National Assembly, I will have to watch carefully. However, it is absurd for the Justice Party, which has shown the most shameful behavior in the history of progressive parties, such as defection from the party and transfer to a new reform party after sending a young man who has not been proven to be proportional to the National Assembly, to argue over the face of proportional candidates of the party.
I'll wrap up here because I said I'll talk briefly. The rest of the articles by both houses of Congress are correct, but that's why there are only one story. It doesn't matter who tells the right story, it's what makes the right story into reality.
The title of both houses' contribution is "The Cho Kuk Innovation Party will not replace the Justice Party." The Cho Kuk Innovation Party has no intention of replacing the Justice Party, and voters do not want the Cho Kuk Innovation Party to replace the Justice Party. What we are asking the Cho Kuk Innovation Party is to prevent the prosecution dictatorship from exploding in Yoon Suk Yeol. Seeing my country being beaten, I hope that people like me will get rid of the fear that if I get caught wrong by the prosecution, I could die.
The Cho Kuk Innovation Party replacing the Justice Party? What on earth do you want me to replace the Justice Party? Isn't the Justice Party's self-respect too harsh? I hope that both lawmakers, who succeeded to the post due to Ryu Ho-jung's departure, will leave the Cho Kuk Innovation Party, which is doing much better than expected, and worry about the Green Justice Party. Looking at the current approval rating of the Green Justice Party, which has been less than 1% since the establishment of the Justice Party, my face is burning even though I gave up my affection.
I've never dreamed that my Justice Party would be the party that kneels down and begs for survival in Gwanghwamun.
'미국주식 종목분석' 카테고리의 다른 글
소비자 물가지수가 예상에 부합된 결과를 내놓는다면 물가 둔화가 지속되고 있음을 보여주고 (26) | 2024.04.10 |
---|---|
다이먼회장 미국금리 8%까지 올려야한다 주장 (23) | 2024.04.10 |
생각보다 금리인하는 멀고먼 이야기가 되었네요 (28) | 2024.04.09 |
U.S. presidential election status. Trump still has a (31) | 2024.04.09 |
시장이 다시 차근차근 악재해소하고 반등하는게 많아진것 같네요 (29) | 2024.04.09 |