When you write controversial articles on

When you write controversial articles on

There are often people who criticize others for writing so that they can misunderstand the issue even though they did not write abstractly, or who misread the subject of the article and write comments that deviate from the issue.

Comments that are sarcastic about the content of the article may sometimes raise eyebrows, but comments that are not related to the topic of the article make you look for a blocking button.

(I have never blocked it for reasons other than severe swear words, hate speech about innate characteristics, content suspected of schizophrenia, and spam.)
.

Tips for when arguments run parallel!

It is good to use ChatGPT.

For example, let's look at the argument that occurred in the recent article of Dear Delivery Brother. In the input text below, A is a courier type, and B and C are a courier type fetching.
.

< ChatGPT Input Statement>

Please analyze the conversation below.

[A] There are times when I can't breathe while talking
There are times when this person feels that there is a wall beyond convincing

The biggest thing I've felt recently was when I saw someone say to the boss that he could earn a salary of course

Surprisingly, you can't get paid
be taken apart from each other
The boss was so into gambling that he couldn't give it to me
The client goes underwater, the warehouse is on fire, the bank goes bankrupt, and for all sorts of reasons, they don't get paid
So sometimes I starve myself

The reason is that if you don't get it, you don't get it
That's the world I've lived in

It is said that the government will designate another temporary holiday
They say they're surprised to eat and play
But you have to make money to eat and play
Life with dinner?
What kind of dinner life when you don't have money to buy dinner?

They're civil servants. If you take your time, a bundle of money will fall from the sky, so I guess it's because the money is falling
Private enterprises make money by working
What the hell do you mean by spending money without letting me make money?
How can I pay my salary when I can't make money?

[B] Of course, if you signed a contract, you should give it to them. People in this country think it's too funny

It's not like someone's threatening me with a knife to sign a salary contract

[C] Of course, no one is denying what needs to be given.
What can you do if you don't have money to give?
I think it's about.

[B] So, if you make a claim to the state, the state gives it to you and sets up a system to claim the right to indemnity from the president

[C] Then you don't have to worry about so-called 'Jeonse fraud' and 'wage arrears' at all

The system is in place for the state to give it to the landlord or boss and claim the right to indemnity.

The system is text, and it's a reality to go through because you don't get paid right away.

The system doesn't always go for granted like it does on Earth.
It's just a matter of course.

It's natural that you don't get paid and no one says it's justified.

I just don't have money. The state doesn't have money. If I don't have money now, what I can do is disappear and it's a reality that I'm searching. This is to keep in mind that the state or the system can't solve everything.

[A] I forgot what I was talking about. Thank you

[B] No matter how much I look at it, it sounds like someone is saying that it's justified

[C] It happens everywhere on Earth, of course, to be robbed of money.
But it's a different matter from saying that it's justified.

[B] So, isn't it fair for the boss to give you a salary
.

< ChatGPT Response >

This conversation contains debates over the legitimacy and practical issues of salary payments. The main perspectives and issues of the participants are as follows.

1. A's perspective

A emphasizes the reality that receiving a salary is not necessarily guaranteed.

- Reality Awareness: A claims that while salary payments are contractually natural, they may not be paid in reality due to a number of variables. For example, a president's bankruptcy, client issues, and disaster situations.

- Distrust: A criticizes government policies (such as designating temporary holidays) based on this reality, highlighting the differences between civil servants and private companies.

- Cynical Attitude: A sees that systems or regulations alone cannot solve all the problems, and that ideals like "Life with Evening" are not realistic.

2. B's perspective

B emphasizes the justification for the payment of salaries under the contract.

- Respect for the contract: B insists that salary payments should be made "of course" under the contract, and sees it as a problem not to abide by them.

- The role of the state: B suggests that the state should come up with a system to pay instead and then claim the right to indemnity from the president to solve the problem of overdue wages.

- Misconception of the context of the conversation: misreading or over-interpreting C's claims as "sounds justified."

3. the perspective of C

C criticizes B's idealistic approach, pointing to the gap between party and reality.

- Realistic Attitude: C agrees with the justification for payment of salaries under the contract, but emphasizes that it is difficult to solve it without money in reality.

- Limitations of the system: states or institutions cannot immediately solve all problems and claim that "the system is not always working properly."

- Irony and refutation: take B's offer as a premise and point out the reality that problems such as charter fraud and unpaid wages are not solved.

4. a key point in the conversation

(1) Justification of Payments: All participants agree that salaries must be paid in accordance with the contract.

(2) Limitations of Reality and System: A and C emphasize problems in reality and imperfections in the system, criticizing B for overlooking them.

(3) State's Role: B argues for the importance of state intervention, but A and C point out that states or institutions cannot solve all problems.

5. Conflict Structure of Conversation

- A and C vs. B: A and C, which emphasize the complexity of reality and the limitations of the system, are at odds with B, which argues for an ideal system.

- B's idealism and misreading: B refutes A and C's claims describing the "reality of not being paid" by mistaking them as "justifications." This tends to repeat the point without being clearly sorted out.

6. the significance of a conversation

This conversation shows the conflict between ideals (righteousness) and reality (realism)