This is how the first phrase of "Mencius" begins.

A gentleman does not use a trick.

This is how the first phrase of "Mencius" begins.

Mencius met King Yang-hye of the Wei Dynasty (孟 見梁惠 Wang)
The king said,
"The teacher came all the way to visit us
What are the benefits for this country going forward?"
Mencius answered,
"Why does the king say profit?
I only follow righteousness."

However, in the modern Korean Party Law
Political parties (黨) are not the realization of human righteousness
Aim for the 'interest of the people'.

a party law
Article 2 (Definitions) In this Act, the term "party" means
Promote responsible political arguments or policies for the benefit of the people
(overstatement) ... refers to the voluntary organization of the people.

In modern society, the interests of the people are the interests of the state
The political party is
Like King Yang Hye's question, it is aimed at the "interest of the country (the people)."

But "Profit" is
It's a very subjective concept.
It means generosity towards others
Unlike righteousness, which refers to fair justice in society
Profits are biased
This is because you can necessarily demand damage or damage from the other side.
On the contrary, for "Humanity"
The entire nation (state) should be able to suffer or bear the damage.

Sure.
This "profit"
the interests of the people or the whole nation
When you have publicity
You can have the ethics of 'public good'.
But even if it's the good of the whole people or the whole group
If it's about profit
This is just a collective 'supervision'
It is not what Mencius refers to as universal and objective 'human intentions'.
No, on the contrary.
The good of a group based on profit is
It could be the ideological basis of fascism.

Yoon Seok-nun's War of Martial Law
Public support is said to have exceeded 40 percent.
I don't understand
It can be done enough.
Like the party's reasons set out in the party law
Modern politics isn't about seeking justice
If you're aiming for profit
About the illegal martial law and the act of civil war
based on one's own understanding and subjective judgment
This is because they can have different opinions.

But the bigger problem is
in the name of "humanity" or justice
Even those who want to bring this illegal martial law and civil war to justice
using justice to calculate one's own profits
It's a trick.

Yoon Seok-eun, about the civil war
Excluding rebellion from the Constitutional Court's impeachment motion is
It's purposeful and common sense
Again, if the main content of the National Assembly's impeachment was the crime of rebellion
Even if the Constitutional Court's impeachment hearings drag on
We shouldn't exclude this
The captain is also
Of course, it's a claim based on self-interest calculations
It's not that wrong.

Obviously, the Democratic Party  
Excluding the rebellion
Take the impeachment hearing as short as possible
Before the Supreme Court's final ruling on Lee Jae-myung
There is a calculation to start the next presidential election.

This calculation is not what Mencius said.
It's a calculation based on profit.

Those who claim justice
He's looking at his own interests
Of course, that definition is also a calculated definition
I'm losing my strength.

The rebellion of the conservative Yoon Seok-eun
It's a wrong criminal act
How can you not know??
They know that they've been interested in their own political interests
even if it's going to cost you money
He was silent and agreed to impeachment.
but
The Democrats use the blade of justice
They're looking at their own interests
They also now have a justification to claim their interests.

Don't play tricks when you say justice.
When you say justice, don't argue for profit.    

The wise man is bright in righteousness and the small man is bright in profit. (喩於利 喩於 君)
                                                                             <The Analects> Lee In-person

When a man who holds the blade of justice finds his interests
Small people are gaining power again.
Small people are also the majority and the people.
And their interests also
It is the 'interest of the people' under the party law.