Assuming that the proportion

I find it more shocking than the Supreme Court's ridiculous ruling that there are so many people who are seriously deceived by ridiculous near-funny lies that don't even need to mention science, physics and statistics and believe it is valid

Assuming that the proportion of people who fold in is 10%, what is the probability that 10% of random voters will fold in 500 consecutive times? Honestly, it's a pity to explain this ridiculous phenomenon by mentioning the probability

In addition, there have been many cases in which two or three ballots are tightly combined like glue, which is explained by the physics principle of being "statically attached."

It's much more shocking to me to say that this is a lie that you're seriously mocking and ridiculing, let alone angry, that you firmly believe it's true

If someone claims to be a Harvard mathematics professor and develops an incredibly complicated formula that they have never heard before and claims to be 1+1=3, should I think so?

Don't you have common sense and logic?

Where in the world is shape memory paper?

If a third party, or someone in authority, makes 'outrageous' sound plausible, do you take it as ignorance with minimal logic and common sense criticism? Do you have reason, logic and minimal self-esteem?

They claim that out of 500 ballots cast for the new power were verified and that "some" of them looked "faint" when they were examined under a microscope

How faint the folded mark can be observed only with an optical microscope, and how good is the resilience of the shape memory paper that the folded mark can be spread beyond recognition with the naked eye?

It's called 'partial' because I have a guilty conscience to lie openly

Then, how would you explain the remaining majority of the paper that couldn't find the folded mark with an optical microscope, and the ballots that have 2-3 sheets attached exactly differently?

I'm really curious if you're not angry because you're so blatantly cheating, treating you like a fool, and mocking you

Even if you're deceived, you should be deceived by plausible lies and fraud. How can you agree that it's true, let alone angry, when you commit fraud that is close to ridicule

The person who voted with this kind of ballot did not have any doubt, but at the same time he or she voted alone, he or she put two or three sheets without folding them and did not report them to the election official,

The Supreme Court and the NEC claim that folded ballots have naturally been restored over time

You believe this?

This ridiculous logic is not my story, it is the arguments of the NEC and the Supreme Court

Since these voters tend to fold, early voters tend not to fold, and Democratic supporters agree that this tendency is not applied independently, the probability of independence should not be applied, and assuming that this premise is true, is it enough to come out?

If you listen to your fellow doctors working in the emergency room, you can hear patients who are too passionate about "study" visit the hospital more often than you think.

He's so passionate about learning that he puts something in it (thick ballpoint pen, thin short bottle) and comes to the emergency room complaining of abdominal pain,

If you ask me how I got into this "accident,"

"I slipped and fell while taking a shower in the bathroom, and the object that was standing vertically on the bathroom floor accidentally got stuck in." It is very serious and serious

I seriously think the serious statements made by patients enthusiastic about 'academic' are far more statistically probable and more likely to be true from a logical and reasonable perspective than the mechanisms of shape memory paper and static electricity in the NEC and the Supreme Court, what do you think?

If you've ever been passionate about learning, please answer